As FCHT have been cleared to go to playoffs, does that mean the EFL have given their go ahead for 3 teams to play at the Shay? If so when is the re construction going to start?, and where will Fax play as it is expected to take 10 weeks to lay a hybrid pitch ? On another note the football have continually complained about the pitch being the poor home form, did not seem to bother the away sides!
Yorkshire water have certain objections has seen here
a) the submitted drawing should show foul and surface water drainage proposals both on and off site b) the submitted drawing should show surface water storage and flow control rate 2) On the Statutory Sewer Map, there is a 1675 mm diameter public combined water sewer recorded to cross the site. It is essential that the presence of this infrastructure is taken into account in the design of the scheme. a) It may not be acceptable to raise or lower ground levels over the sewer and we will not accept any inspection chambers on the sewer to be built over. b) In this instance, a stand-off distance of 5 (five) metres is required at each side of the sewer centre-line and it may not be acceptable to raise or lower ground levels over the sewer, nor to restrict access to the manholes on the sewer. c) A proposal by the developer to alter/divert a public sewer will be subject to Yorkshire Water's requirements and formal procedure in accordance with Section 185 Water Industry Act 1991. 3) The developer is proposing to discharge surface water to public sewer however, sustainable development requires appropriate surface water disposal. a) Yorkshire Water promote the surface water disposal hierarchy and the developer must provide evidence to demonstrate that surface water disposal via infiltration or watercourse are not reasonably practical before considering disposal to public sewer. b) It should be noted that land drainage is not permitted to enter the public sewer network, an alternative means of surface water disposal should be explored. c) It is understood that a culverted watercourse is located crossing the site. This appears to be the obvious place for surface water disposal. d) The developer and LPA are strongly advised to seek comments on surface water disposal from other drainage bodies as further restrictions may be imposed.
Yorkshire water have certain objections has seen here
a) the submitted drawing should show foul and surface water drainage proposals both on and off site b) the submitted drawing should show surface water storage and flow control rate 2) On the Statutory Sewer Map, there is a 1675 mm diameter public combined water sewer recorded to cross the site. It is essential that the presence of this infrastructure is taken into account in the design of the scheme. a) It may not be acceptable to raise or lower ground levels over the sewer and we will not accept any inspection chambers on the sewer to be built over. b) In this instance, a stand-off distance of 5 (five) metres is required at each side of the sewer centre-line and it may not be acceptable to raise or lower ground levels over the sewer, nor to restrict access to the manholes on the sewer. c) A proposal by the developer to alter/divert a public sewer will be subject to Yorkshire Water's requirements and formal procedure in accordance with Section 185 Water Industry Act 1991. 3) The developer is proposing to discharge surface water to public sewer however, sustainable development requires appropriate surface water disposal. a) Yorkshire Water promote the surface water disposal hierarchy and the developer must provide evidence to demonstrate that surface water disposal via infiltration or watercourse are not reasonably practical before considering disposal to public sewer. b) It should be noted that land drainage is not permitted to enter the public sewer network, an alternative means of surface water disposal should be explored. c) It is understood that a culverted watercourse is located crossing the site. This appears to be the obvious place for surface water disposal. d) The developer and LPA are strongly advised to seek comments on surface water disposal from other drainage bodies as further restrictions may be imposed.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
