Re: Sir Tony : Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:17 pm  

wrencat1873 wrote:

It's hard to offer balanced "evidence" with the US presidents hand up you rear end.
Let's face it, there isn't a UK PM that would defy the US, not of any political persuasion, apart from the maybe the Lib Dems but, they will never have to make the call.
It's the price that "we" pay for having their "protection".

If they say jump, it's just a matter of how high.

The daily Evidence" of WMD was just embarrassing and it's no surprise that, even now, nothing had been discovered.

Hugh Grant defied the US !!! Does that count?

Unfortunately for Blair, many people will only remember him for the WMD fiasco.

Re: Sir Tony : Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:19 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

A friend like you makes not having any a positive even if it is true. I don’t know if you are still getting third hand information about me but I can definitely confirm that my first hand knowledge does not know this made up name unless you think I move in the world of the NBA.
I presume you get the irony of your post because I cannot see the connection with the topic maybe you should start a new one about how many friends each member has.

Below is a post from an acquaintance of yours even though you deny having any, he has a penchant for NBA players, another one of his is Steph Curry hope that helps

TheWarringtonWolve69 wrote:

The only reason I visit the sin bin these days is to read SP’s daily beat down on chissitt. It’s hilarious

Another one that uses American euphemisms, scary.

Re: Sir Tony : Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:23 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Even he couldn't defend the indefensible, just simply a pathetic attempt at trying to deflect from the embarrassment of the former Labour leader by including Cameron, your 1/10 is quite fair, I assume it's for predictability and not for the lack of substance.

TBF i am a reasonable person - i gave it 1/10 as there was no blame attached to Trinity!!

Re: Sir Tony : Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:26 pm  

To be an acquaintance needs me to know him or her a little bit but your posts suggest this fits you better than me squire and once again you are deflecting from your own shortcomings and not staying on topic, naughty, naughty.

Re: Sir Tony : Mon Jan 10, 2022 6:25 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Even he couldn't defend the indefensible, just simply a pathetic attempt at trying to deflect from the embarrassment of the former Labour leader by including Cameron, your 1/10 is quite fair, I assume it's for predictability and not for the lack of substance.

Whoah, hang on, hang on.
Did you just accuse somebody else of "pathetically trying to deflect" attention from a politician?

The irony meter has just exploded!

Re: Sir Tony : Tue Jan 11, 2022 7:43 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

To be an acquaintance needs me to know him or her a little bit but your posts suggest this fits you better than me squire and once again you are deflecting from your own shortcomings and not staying on topic, naughty, naughty.

He is RLFANS king of whataboutery

Re: Sir Tony : Tue Jan 11, 2022 8:36 am  

TheWarringtonWolve69 wrote:

He is RLFANS king of whataboutery

And what is your claim to fame exactly?, besides the obvious.

Re: Sir Tony : Tue Jan 11, 2022 8:40 am  

The Ghost of '99 wrote:

Whoah, hang on, hang on.
Did you just accuse somebody else of "pathetically trying to deflect" attention from a politician?

The irony meter has just exploded!

Your not as dumb as you appear to be at times, well worked out btw.