RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
23 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - IMG
Re: IMG Thu Sep 29, 2022 8:21 am  
Re: IMG
Thu Sep 29, 2022 8:21 am  
steadygetyerboots-on Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 5:39 pm
Posts: 1172
Location: Working in the belly of the beast!
Member for 17 years
For me; it’s the lack of detail that is most concerning. All IMG have done is create an environment of uncertainty & fear, which will undoubtedly turn nasty among fans - it’s already starting with club comparisons - I really hoped we’d left the off field stuff behind us, but here we go again.
Now you could argue that this is intentional; to force clubs like my own (Cas) to get their house in order - we already had a warning shot across the bough will the academy initially failing to get a licence, whether we’ve taken this in board remains to be seen.
What I would have loved to have read about is how IMG & the RFL are going to support category B clubs attain A status - something I communicated in the survey. Both Cas & Wakey have been so unlucky in ground development terms; literally everything that could go against us has - even now with your own development, the misfortune of outside influences (these absolute disaster capitalists in gov’t for one) is hampering you. Where’s the support from the RFL been? I’m talking historical here. Instead they regularly fined both our clubs for the state of our grounds, fan behaviour - tell me with a straight face you haven’t seen/heard fans from other clubs do the things we’ve been fined for - Now how the hell has any of that helped us improve our situation? The truth is it keeps us right where other certain clubs want us. They sport should be helping clubs up, not keeping them down & I fear it’s going to be more of the same from IMG after reading that statement. They’ll keep us around until the “expansion” clubs are ready - London, Toulouse, York & Newcastle are the first to spring to mind, with an outside chance for Bradford if they could get their act together, then we’re toast.
"Stand by me as I stand by you, be brave and dare to dream".
Re: IMG Thu Sep 29, 2022 8:44 am  
Re: IMG
Thu Sep 29, 2022 8:44 am  

1315trinity wrote:
1315trinity Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 6:23 pm
Posts: 951
Location: Durkar
Member for 3 years
The problem with RL as I see it is that a lot of supporters think that RL outside SL is not worth watching and is a slow death for a club. Complete rubbish, of course, there's some excellent rugby played at lower level and in better grounds than ours was.
There should be more importance placed on the Championship and better support provided from the RL.
As for us, as has been said, the only way to break up the likes of Saint Helens and Leeds etc is to get smart and join them.
Quite frankly Saints, Wigan, Leeds and in the past Bradford have had much more than their share of glory because they have done things better than us, oh and of course they have money - blast I forgot that!
Re: IMG Thu Sep 29, 2022 8:48 am  
Re: IMG
Thu Sep 29, 2022 8:48 am  

Prince Buster User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 1:17 pm
Posts: 4354
Location: Orange street
Member for 18 years
steadygetyerboots-on wrote:
For me; it’s the lack of detail that is most concerning. All IMG have done is create an environment of uncertainty & fear, which will undoubtedly turn nasty among fans - it’s already starting with club comparisons - I really hoped we’d left the off field stuff behind us, but here we go again.
Now you could argue that this is intentional; to force clubs like my own (Cas) to get their house in order - we already had a warning shot across the bough will the academy initially failing to get a licence, whether we’ve taken this in board remains to be seen.
What I would have loved to have read about is how IMG & the RFL are going to support category B clubs attain A status - something I communicated in the survey. Both Cas & Wakey have been so unlucky in ground development terms; literally everything that could go against us has - even now with your own development, the misfortune of outside influences (these absolute disaster capitalists in gov’t for one) is hampering you. Where’s the support from the RFL been? I’m talking historical here. Instead they regularly fined both our clubs for the state of our grounds, fan behaviour - tell me with a straight face you haven’t seen/heard fans from other clubs do the things we’ve been fined for - Now how the hell has any of that helped us improve our situation? The truth is it keeps us right where other certain clubs want us. They sport should be helping clubs up, not keeping them down & I fear it’s going to be more of the same from IMG after reading that statement. They’ll keep us around until the “expansion” clubs are ready - London, Toulouse, York & Newcastle are the first to spring to mind, with an outside chance for Bradford if they could get their act together, then we’re toast.

Good post steady .
How can anyone give credibility or trust a report that can have such a huge influence on our future that lacks so much detail. For instance, so much talk of cat A or cat B. The report mentions these catagories at length and also states how they will influence league status. Yet ! not a single word or explanation of their respective definitions. Here we all are saying this club will be Cat A because it has this,that or the other. This club will be CatB because it lacks this, that and the other. Truth is no one has a clue, everyone is guessing , so ask yourself why has the report failed to give the slightest detail about these rankings ? What are they hiding ?
Re: IMG Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:08 am  
Re: IMG
Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:08 am  

User avatarvastman wrote:
vastman User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 5:37 pm
Posts: 35215
Location: Poodle Power!
Member for 18 years
Prince Buster wrote:
Good post steady .
How can anyone give credibility or trust a report that can have such a huge influence on our future that lacks so much detail. For instance, so much talk of cat A or cat B. The report mentions these catagories at length and also states how they will influence league status. Yet ! not a single word or explanation of their respective definitions. Here we all are saying this club will be Cat A because it has this,that or the other. This club will be CatB because it lacks this, that and the other. Truth is no one has a clue, everyone is guessing , so ask yourself why has the report failed to give the slightest detail about these rankings ? What are they hiding ?


PB there is loads of detail, just go back 15 years and read Framing the Future, it's almost identical just different buzz words :lol:
SUPPORT SWAG...
Re: IMG Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:15 am  
Re: IMG
Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:15 am  

User avatarwrencat1873 wrote:
wrencat1873 User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:28 pm
Posts: 17377
Member for 12 years
vastman wrote:
I'm not talking about the proposal such as they are. I was purely commentating on the idea of some kind of break away.

The only way to change the way RL is run is from the inside. This is not the FA or even Brexit, RL is a tiny sport with only a relatively low value, no sport could need a civil war less than we do.

It's now up to those who run the clubs to hammer out the best strategy possible within the limited room for manoeuvre that the sport has. We certainly can't afford to isolate SKY with talk of break aways, suicidal for the wider game and plays into the hands of the greedy elite.


I certainly agree regarding breakaways, which would be even less helpful than the IMG proposal.
For me, it was the inference that off field issues will be more important than what takes place on the field of play.

They seem to have forgotten that RL is a sport and not some sort of corporate "ladder".

Many of us remember how Huddersfield were "saved" every season, primarily because of their stadium. Even their own fans thought that it was wrong, and we seem to be back in that mindset?
Re: IMG Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:20 am  
Re: IMG
Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:20 am  

User avatarvastman wrote:
vastman User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 5:37 pm
Posts: 35215
Location: Poodle Power!
Member for 18 years
wrencat1873 wrote:
I certainly agree regarding breakaways, which would be even less helpful than the IMG proposal.
For me, it was the inference that off field issues will be more important than what takes place on the field of play.

They seem to have forgotten that RL is a sport and not some sort of corporate "ladder".

Many of us remember how Huddersfield were "saved" every season, primarily because of their stadium. Even their own fans thought that it was wrong, and we seem to be back in that mindset?


Ever since SL began the off-field v on-field debate has been at the core of the problem.

I'm actually not against off-field being the priority. However it has to be scrupulously fair and brilliantly implemented to actually work. In that regard SL has been an utter failure, and from what I see IMG are just time and motion men with a bunch of buzz words and will be no better, window dressers. God knows what this will be costing the game.
SUPPORT SWAG...
Re: IMG Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:21 am  
Re: IMG
Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:21 am  

Prince Buster User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 1:17 pm
Posts: 4354
Location: Orange street
Member for 18 years
vastman wrote:
PB there is loads of detail, just go back 15 years and read Framing the Future, it's almost identical just different buzz words :lol:

Vasty we all know about framing the future Just show me where in this report it states we will use the same criteria. Just show me one fact for definate that you will have to achieve to be Cat A. It could be something along those lines yes but still made to fit their own agenda. Yet it could be things never mentioned before.

As a matter of interest ,didnt framing the future state you must have a 10K capacity stadium, if so and you are suggesting thats what the will use ,thats us done. Truth is you dont know, and neither does hardly any one else.
Re: IMG Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:28 am  
Re: IMG
Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:28 am  

User avatarPopTart wrote:
PopTart User avatar
100% League Network
100% League Network

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:10 am
Posts: 16980
Location: wakefield
Member for 14 years
Unfortunately, you can't have transparency of the process and also know all the derails at the first press conference.

IMG have put together a structure they feel the can run with to improve the game.
There has to be a vote of all clubs to ratify that. If a majority says yes then they can move forward.
If tge vote says no, any low level detail was wasted. Its just a stepped approach.

I would think they will add more detail as they go but they haven't start somewhere.
The alternative was to keep it all a secret until after the vote.
It would have created less noise but no one would have had chance to put their opinion forward.
A dog is not considered a good dog because he is a good barker. A man is not considered a good man because he is a good talker - Buddha
Re: IMG Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:36 am  
Re: IMG
Thu Sep 29, 2022 9:36 am  

User avatarvastman wrote:
vastman User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 5:37 pm
Posts: 35215
Location: Poodle Power!
Member for 18 years
Prince Buster wrote:
Vasty we all know about framing the future Just show me where in this report it states we will use the same criteria. Just show me one fact for definate that you will have to achieve to be Cat A. It could be something along those lines yes but still made to fit their own agenda. Yet it could be things never mentioned before.

As a matter of interest ,didnt framing the future state you must have a 10K capacity stadium, if so and you are suggesting thats what the will use ,thats us done. Truth is you dont know, and neither does hardly any one else.


I was joking!

Framing the future was full of vague nonsense and so is this - i did put a laughing emoji at the end 8)
SUPPORT SWAG...
Re: IMG Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:00 am  
Re: IMG
Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:00 am  

Prince Buster User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 1:17 pm
Posts: 4354
Location: Orange street
Member for 18 years
vastman wrote:
I was joking!

Framing the future was full of vague nonsense and so is this - i did put a laughing emoji at the end 8)

Chuffin emoji,s can hardly see them without my specs
Lets both get strapped in, because this new circus is only just starting, months of fun and laughs ahead I think.
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: djcool, Hopwood, imwakefieldtillidie, Kingfisher, lampyboy, LG83, musson, Spookisback and 137 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to Wakefield Trinity


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
7m
Rumours and signings v9
The pieman
24847
31m
Renouf Atoni
Spookisback
45
54m
Game - Song Titles 20212
Shinedown
17803
55m
BORED The Band Name Game
Shinedown
35139
56m
anyone work in banking advice needed
Maccbull_Big
2
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
1m
Renouf Atoni
Spookisback
45
1m
Confirmed 2023 squad
jason b
101
1m
anyone work in banking advice needed
Maccbull_Big
2
1m
Andrew Farrell RIP
Hangerman2
2
1m
Betting in 2023
Or thane
52
1m
Eddie Jones to RL
Cruncher
3
2m
Harry Newman
Seth
8
2m
Transfer talk
Pyrah123
705
2m
JD in the Bye round
Pat Bateman
3
2m
Leigh to be a better prospect than Wigan in 1-2 years
WWste
13
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
anyone work in banking advice needed
Maccbull_Big
2
TODAY
JD in the Bye round
Pat Bateman
3
TODAY
cas
Trojan Horse
4
TODAY
Andrew Farrell RIP
Hangerman2
2
TODAY
Eddie Jones to RL
Cruncher
3
TODAY
A little concerning
Spookisback
31
TODAY
Retro Shirt
DiggerHFC
1
TODAY
O/T Poblems at Skolars
wire-quin
2
TODAY
Leigh to be a better prospect than Wigan in 1-2 years
WWste
13
TODAY
Foreign investment
micktheleyth
2
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
Australia World Champions Agai..
5740
Jillaroos Demolish the Ferns t..
1690
England Beat France in Nail-bi..
2655
New Zealand Ferns Final Bound ..
1546
Australia Power Into Womens Fi..
1599
Samoa Into the Final As Englis..
1738
Australia Squeeze Into The Fin..
4484
Jilleroos Scrape Home Against ..
1996
Cook Islands Sign Off With Vic..
2579
England 19-man squad for RLWC ..
2489
St Helens to face Penrith Pant..
2430
England Top Group A With Big W..
2159
Canada End World Cup With Tigh..
1942
Record Breaking Masterclass fr..
3168
Ferns Win As Cooks Score First..
2476
POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORD
19.4Million +11,001 79,3139,323
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.

When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
RLFANS Match Centre
 Fri 17th Feb 2023
     Mens Super League XXVIII-R1
19:30
Wakefield
v
Catalans
 Fri 24th Feb 2023
     Mens Super League XXVIII-R2
20:00
Wigan
v
Wakefield
 Fri 3rd Mar 2023
     Mens Super League XXVIII-R3
19:45
Wakefield
v
Huddersfield
 Fri 10th Mar 2023
     Mens Super League XXVIII-R4
20:00
Leeds
v
Wakefield
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)
Matches on TV
Thu 16th Feb
SL-M
20:00
Warrington-Leeds
Fri 17th Feb
SL-M
20:00
Leigh-Salford
Sat 18th Feb
SL-M
13:00
Hull KR-Wigan
WCC2023
07:00
Penrith-St.Helens
Thu 23rd Feb
SL-M
20:00
Salford-Hull KR
Fri 24th Feb
SL-M
20:00
Leeds-Hull FC
Sun 26th Feb
SL-M
13:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Thu 2nd Mar
SL-M
20:00
Warrington-Salford
Fri 3rd Mar
SL-M
20:00
St.Helens-Leeds
Thu 9th Mar
SL-M
20:00
Wigan-Catalans
Fri 10th Mar
SL-M
20:00
Huddersfield-Castleford
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Huddersfield 0 0 0 0 0
Leigh 0 0 0 0 0
St.Helens 0 0 0 0 0
Castleford 0 0 0 0 0
Wakefield 0 0 0 0 0
Leeds 0 0 0 0 0
 
Hull KR 0 0 0 0 0
Warrington 0 0 0 0 0
Salford 0 0 0 0 0
Wigan 0 0 0 0 0
Hull FC 0 0 0 0 0
Catalans 0 0 0 0 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
7m
Rumours and signings v9
The pieman
24847
31m
Renouf Atoni
Spookisback
45
54m
Game - Song Titles 20212
Shinedown
17803
55m
BORED The Band Name Game
Shinedown
35139
56m
anyone work in banking advice needed
Maccbull_Big
2
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
1m
Renouf Atoni
Spookisback
45
1m
Confirmed 2023 squad
jason b
101
1m
anyone work in banking advice needed
Maccbull_Big
2
1m
Andrew Farrell RIP
Hangerman2
2
1m
Betting in 2023
Or thane
52
1m
Eddie Jones to RL
Cruncher
3
2m
Harry Newman
Seth
8
2m
Transfer talk
Pyrah123
705
2m
JD in the Bye round
Pat Bateman
3
2m
Leigh to be a better prospect than Wigan in 1-2 years
WWste
13
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
anyone work in banking advice needed
Maccbull_Big
2
TODAY
JD in the Bye round
Pat Bateman
3
TODAY
cas
Trojan Horse
4
TODAY
Andrew Farrell RIP
Hangerman2
2
TODAY
Eddie Jones to RL
Cruncher
3
TODAY
A little concerning
Spookisback
31
TODAY
Retro Shirt
DiggerHFC
1
TODAY
O/T Poblems at Skolars
wire-quin
2
TODAY
Leigh to be a better prospect than Wigan in 1-2 years
WWste
13
TODAY
Foreign investment
micktheleyth
2
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
Australia World Champions Agai..
5740
Jillaroos Demolish the Ferns t..
1690
England Beat France in Nail-bi..
2655
New Zealand Ferns Final Bound ..
1546
Australia Power Into Womens Fi..
1599
Samoa Into the Final As Englis..
1738
Australia Squeeze Into The Fin..
4484
Jilleroos Scrape Home Against ..
1996
Cook Islands Sign Off With Vic..
2579
England 19-man squad for RLWC ..
2489
St Helens to face Penrith Pant..
2430
England Top Group A With Big W..
2159
Canada End World Cup With Tigh..
1942
Record Breaking Masterclass fr..
3168
Ferns Win As Cooks Score First..
2476


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!