FORUMS FORUMS







RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

   WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Priti Patel omg
::Off-topic discussion.
Re: Priti Patel omg : Thu Mar 05, 2020 6:01 pm  
Backwoodsman wrote:
Slightly off thread, why would anybody want to bring Royal Mail under government control. What’s so special about a company that delivers mail and parcels. As sub contractors more or less in the construction industry we are virtually paper free. Everything is done online , however we get parcels from various companies including Royal Mail . So Royal Mail aren’t particularly unique.


Ever heard of E-commerce???
Re: Priti Patel omg : Thu Mar 05, 2020 8:52 pm  
bren2k wrote:
What do you mean?


OK in simplistic terms just for you - if your wages stay at a similar level but the council build a new trunk road that reduced your journey or clinicians improve a technique that increases your life expectancy - would you say your well being has improved even though your wages have remained static? A new trunk road isn't only available to the fortunate few its available to everyone. Quality of life isn't just about money
Re: Priti Patel omg : Thu Mar 05, 2020 8:54 pm  
Backwoodsman wrote:
Slightly off thread, why would anybody want to bring Royal Mail under government control. What’s so special about a company that delivers mail and parcels. As sub contractors more or less in the construction industry we are virtually paper free. Everything is done online , however we get parcels from various companies including Royal Mail . So Royal Mail aren’t particularly unique.


Who delivers your letters?
Re: Priti Patel omg : Fri Mar 06, 2020 9:20 am  
Sal Paradise wrote:
OK in simplistic terms just for you - if your wages stay at a similar level but the council build a new trunk road that reduced your journey or clinicians improve a technique that increases your life expectancy - would you say your well being has improved even though your wages have remained static? A new trunk road isn't only available to the fortunate few its available to everyone. Quality of life isn't just about money


I'm none the wiser; of course I understand the concept of wellbeing and happiness being about more than money - although that does beg the question why a small % of people hoard so much of it at everyone else's cost - but what on earth does that have to do with my original point?
Re: Priti Patel omg : Fri Mar 06, 2020 10:16 am  
King Street Cat wrote:
Ever heard of E-commerce???

Yes
Re: Priti Patel omg : Fri Mar 06, 2020 10:28 am  
Sal Paradise wrote:
Who delivers your letters?

I never receive letters, my family, friends etc etc use e-mail. I do however receive lots of junk mail and stuff that could be sent online. Eg seed catalogues, I view this online but for some reason they still send me these through the post.One of the reasons why I am genuinely puzzled as to why labour would want to own a business that may be in decline. Certainly on the parcels side of the business it would appear to be highly competitive.
Re: Priti Patel omg : Fri Mar 06, 2020 12:15 pm  
Backwoodsman wrote:
Slightly off thread, why would anybody want to bring Royal Mail under government control. What’s so special about a company that delivers mail and parcels. As sub contractors more or less in the construction industry we are virtually paper free. Everything is done online , however we get parcels from various companies including Royal Mail . So Royal Mail aren’t particularly unique.


Royal Mail has the universal service obligation, which means it is required to provide affordable postal services to all UK addresses, at the same price across the UK.

Other providers don't have this legal requirement.

So if you live somewhere out in the sticks, other providers are free to say they don't deliver there or charge you much more for the service.

Now you could remove this universal service obligation and say its tough poop if you live out in the sticks, you should suck it up and pay more as it costs more to deliver it to you. But that would have political costs in those areas.

But while you have an unbalanced regulatory environment - where one firm has an obligation to provide single price/deliver anywhere in the UK terms, and its rivals don't, Royal Mail will always be at a competitive disadvantage to its rivals and less attractive to private investors, hence the argument that if government wants to provide that service it should own it.
Re: Priti Patel omg : Mon Mar 16, 2020 8:04 am  
King Street Cat wrote:
IR80 struggles to provide a reason for it getting dark on a night. He probably thinks jealous, envious, leftist, Trotskyite, Stalinist, Labour voting, Marxist-Leninists cover up the sun with a big iron curtain.

I'm pretty sure he's one of those people who advocate making our own laws... so his beloved Tories can operate outside of them in the name of democracy.

You can say that again. Never answers any questions either I notice. Ignoring it from now on as it adds nothing.
Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 29 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to The Sin Bin